An Edmonton lawyer is piloting a harmonious approach to divorce settlements that could change the game in Canada.
Melissa Bourgeois, with One Family Law, spent the first few years of the COVID-19 pandemic working on a process that allows one lawyer to represent a couple together in legal separation from start to finish, a practice that is currently barred in Canada.
“It’s really a paradigm shift,” Bourgeois says.
“Most people’s viewpoint is that there is only one way to do this — you have to hire your own lawyer, your lawyer represents your interests, you need to go into this very secretive kind of weird portal that you come out of four years later and $100,000 poorer and still have no idea what happened.”
Bourgeois saw the process at work in the United Kingdom, where she says it has become the de facto model for amicably divorced couples. The concept of using one lawyer struck a chord with her, having had a tumultuous career in family law and mediation.
She took a huge risk working for two years on proposals for the Law Society of Alberta, not knowing whether she’d get the green light. She was eventually granted permission and formally launched her pilot project, the one-family lawyer model, in January 2023.
Bourgeois says she’s found many separating couples genuinely want the best for each other. This approach can be especially appealing to parents who want to maintain a constructive co-parenting relationship that will allow them to, for example, attend their kids’ soccer games together.
“It’s a very weird concept to say we’re going to hire a lawyer together because we want each of us to come out of this as well as we can. This oppositional kind of conflict-driven narrative is something that, throughout the years of my practice, I was finding people just simply don’t want,” she says.
“The average family doesn’t really have a huge amount of resources to be spending on lawyers. It’s a very mystique-driven process… so this is really putting the power back in people’s hands, providing them with impartial legal information that applies to them. The idea is they decide from there what the terms of the separation should be.”