According to moderator Ryan Jespersen, the four candidates were selected by two criteria, that they were leading in the polls and that “they agreed to attend.” Candidates Mike Nickel and Augustine Marah were not present. Candidate Brian Gregg was outside the Westin Hotel, playing guitar, while candidates Diana Steele, Abdul Chukwudi and Rick Comrie were in the room.
When it came to taxes, Watson pointed out the fact that, while she ran Innovate Edmonton until last year, she hasn’t been an elected official. “I am the only one on the stage who has not raised your taxes.”
Sohi talked about how his family struggled when they first arrived in Edmonton, and he’d carry that same frugality to the mayor’s chair. “Every dollar mattered to us. That’s the kind of discipline I will bring to the city.”
But without specifics, he left himself open to an attack from Oshry, who was able to accuse Sohi of wanting to increase taxes by eight per cent, without rebuttal.
“We need to be competitive with the region, which we’re not,” said Oshry, noting that businesses are choosing to place themselves in other areas of the Edmonton region, rather than Edmonton itself. He said he supports holding the line on taxes in year one, while bringing in a two per cent decrease in year two.
Krushell also pledged to hold the line on taxes. She agreed that Edmonton was the “hole in the doughnut” as it was losing business to the outlying regions, and needs to become more tax competitive.
Oshry said there’s “so much money floating around” globally, and that “none of it is coming to Edmonton.” His solution? To get government to “stop picking winners” and letting the private sector do what it does best.
THE EDIFY VERDICT: Judging by applause from those in attendance, and we need to stress that this was an audience invested in the real-estate business, Watson and Oshry had the biggest impact. Krushell found her feet as the debate went on. But it’s not really about who won — it might be more about who lost.