1. STRATHCONA
Population: 9,618 Total Dwelling Units: 6,345
So everything old is new again, right? For the fourth year in a row, Strathcona has been voted by you, the Avenue readers, as Edmonton’s best neighbourhood in which to live.
But Strathcona’s margin of victory is smaller in 2015 than it has been in previous years. And, for the first time, it didn’t earn the highest number of first-place votes. It got back to the top thanks to a large number of second-, third- and fourth-place votes. But it also finished second in our “most overrated neighbourhood” poll. Still, Strathcona remains our ideal; it’s an example of a dense urban neighbourhood that has plenty of amenities. According to the 2014 Edmonton census, just 27 per cent of the residences in Strathcona are single detached homes. Two-thirds of Strathcona residents live in apartments, either in high-rises or walkups.
It also continues to keep young residents after they’ve left the University of Alberta, located just one neigbourhood over in Garneau. According to the census, the 25-29 age group is the largest demographic in the neighbourhood; 20-24 and 30-34 round out the top three age groups. -Steven Sandor
2. GLENORA
Population: 3,572 Total Dwelling Units: 1,588
Glenora finished second in our best neighbourhood vote. But it was also the runaway winner in the “most overrated neighbourhood” poll.
It is the most established “have” neighbourhood in the city. It has dream homes and giant lots, all within a few minutes of the downtown core. Visit Alexander Circle, where a number of historic homes surround a grand fountain, on Halloween night. Marvel at the number of families who parachute in, knowing it’s home to some of the best treats and family fun in the city.
But, as the most-overrated vote shows, it’s a polarizing neighbourhood. And there’s no doubt that, to many, Glenora feels almost like a gated community.
In a recent poll by the Glenora Community League, residents opposed the city’s plan of allowing lots 50 feet or wider to be subdivided so smaller infill homes could be built. The final tally? An overwhelming 115-42 against. And, when asked if 17-foot wide homes should be allowed, the community voted 114-42 against.